Highly interesting and thought-provoking article👍🏻
Also on substack, there's a man, Viktor Bron, who puts forward his vision and understanding of reality, the AI Game that Source Players like him are confronted by, the identity of the Designer and the challenges that are meant to be overcome.
No religious, spiritual or metaphysical elements, as far as I've partially understood so far, belong to his reasoning and resulting communications, simply logical and rational thinking have been applied.
Here in France, there's an astrophysicist, Jean-Pierre Petit, who proposes his Janus Theory which is a parallel reality/universe adjacent to ours in which time, distance and life are not at all the same.
His cosmological Janus Theory is the fruit of decades of research. The OfficialSpeak established scientific closed club in France have point blank refused to accept his discoveries which have been validated time and time again by observable reality.
To accept his findings would proverbially blow established quantam/string/black hole theory out of the water.
I also recently discovered on substack 'Three Sages' whose creator reveals the teachings of a modern-day 'spiritual master,' Joseph Anton Schneiderfranken aka Bô Yin Râ.
He offers fascinating insights into otherworldly cosmic forces, the 'Prince of Darkness,' an entity who exerts great influence on earthly affairs, the 'Fall of Man,' Jesus' body being removed from his tomb and burned to respect the traditions of the nations that the three kings came from, life after death, oceans of souls, spiritual hierarchies, other earths and the people who live there to name only a few.
Hej Jan, wieder ein bemerkens- und lesenswertes Essay über den Mann, dessen "Blade Runner" ich mehrfach angeschaut habe. Danke Jan, immer wieder klasse, Deine Texte zu lesen. liebe Grüße George
Thanks for the extra info about PKD, an interesting character. I always seem to associate Dick with Brian Adliss, who also wrote about piercing the veil between parallel worlds. While I've read the novels, I never knew much about the authors, so it's interesting to learn more.
Fantastic write up on one of the 20th century's most important authors. Due to my own experiences in this world I have come to accept Dick's version of our reality, that the world in which we live is nothing but an illusion that disguises the prison in which we actually exist. Think about what is meant by imagination, the conjuring up of people, places, experiences, animals, things, everything and anything that does not exist within this reality, how exactly do people create that which does not exist unless they are accessing unfettered consciousness and are remembering experiences from previous lives in other dimensions. Everything Dick wrote about feels like it actually happened, that he was presenting a version of history that he lived. I'm a big believer in authors being the modern day prophets and Dick most certainly prophetic.
What’s striking is how well Dick’s experiences can also be read through Penrose and Hameroff, almost as an inversion of the Everett framing rather than a rejection of physics altogether. In Many‑Worlds, you get a vast ontology of non‑communicating branches; in Orch‑OR you get something more like an epistemology of selection: one classical world per conscious moment, chosen via quantum‑gravitational collapse in the brain’s microtubules, with non‑computable input from the structure of spacetime itself. On that view, Dick isn’t literally hopping between Everett branches; his consciousness is the site where different possible world‑models are explored in quantum superposition and then reduced. “Orthogonal time” becomes the occasional selection of unusually radical alternatives - world‑models in which Nixon doesn’t fall, Rome never ends, or the prison track never got corrected - which then register phenomenologically as visits to parallel presents, déjà vu, and “wrong” memories.
The programmer–reprogrammer and VALIS then map quite naturally onto Penrose’s idea of non‑algorithmic guidance from the fabric of reality. If spacetime’s quantum geometry biases which outcomes are favored at each objective reduction, you effectively have a built‑in steering mechanism nudging histories toward higher complexity or an Omega‑like endpoint. A destabilised temporal lobe plus drugs and anesthesia could easily be recast as a brain with altered Orch‑OR dynamics - overexposed, for a time, to that deeper biasing structure. Dick’s pink beam and sense of an external, information‑rich mind would simply be what it feels like, from the inside, when a human nervous system temporarily gains unusually vivid access to the process by which one history is selected from many. In that Penrosean reading, PKD isn’t a tourist in the multiverse so much as a rare witness to the selection rule underneath it.
Highly interesting and thought-provoking article👍🏻
Also on substack, there's a man, Viktor Bron, who puts forward his vision and understanding of reality, the AI Game that Source Players like him are confronted by, the identity of the Designer and the challenges that are meant to be overcome.
No religious, spiritual or metaphysical elements, as far as I've partially understood so far, belong to his reasoning and resulting communications, simply logical and rational thinking have been applied.
Here in France, there's an astrophysicist, Jean-Pierre Petit, who proposes his Janus Theory which is a parallel reality/universe adjacent to ours in which time, distance and life are not at all the same.
His cosmological Janus Theory is the fruit of decades of research. The OfficialSpeak established scientific closed club in France have point blank refused to accept his discoveries which have been validated time and time again by observable reality.
To accept his findings would proverbially blow established quantam/string/black hole theory out of the water.
Bonne continuation,
CJY🇫🇷
Thank you for this. Ill dig deeper into both.
Hello Jan.
I also recently discovered on substack 'Three Sages' whose creator reveals the teachings of a modern-day 'spiritual master,' Joseph Anton Schneiderfranken aka Bô Yin Râ.
He offers fascinating insights into otherworldly cosmic forces, the 'Prince of Darkness,' an entity who exerts great influence on earthly affairs, the 'Fall of Man,' Jesus' body being removed from his tomb and burned to respect the traditions of the nations that the three kings came from, life after death, oceans of souls, spiritual hierarchies, other earths and the people who live there to name only a few.
Respectueuesement,
Charles Young
Thanks for the tip, Charles
An excellent piece. Thank you I very much enjoyed reading this
Well that was a good read before going to a busy but boring job!
Thank you for a well written piece that adds to my perception of the universe.
Hej Jan, wieder ein bemerkens- und lesenswertes Essay über den Mann, dessen "Blade Runner" ich mehrfach angeschaut habe. Danke Jan, immer wieder klasse, Deine Texte zu lesen. liebe Grüße George
Danke, George, das bedeutet mir sehr viel.
Thanks for the extra info about PKD, an interesting character. I always seem to associate Dick with Brian Adliss, who also wrote about piercing the veil between parallel worlds. While I've read the novels, I never knew much about the authors, so it's interesting to learn more.
Fantastic write up on one of the 20th century's most important authors. Due to my own experiences in this world I have come to accept Dick's version of our reality, that the world in which we live is nothing but an illusion that disguises the prison in which we actually exist. Think about what is meant by imagination, the conjuring up of people, places, experiences, animals, things, everything and anything that does not exist within this reality, how exactly do people create that which does not exist unless they are accessing unfettered consciousness and are remembering experiences from previous lives in other dimensions. Everything Dick wrote about feels like it actually happened, that he was presenting a version of history that he lived. I'm a big believer in authors being the modern day prophets and Dick most certainly prophetic.
What’s striking is how well Dick’s experiences can also be read through Penrose and Hameroff, almost as an inversion of the Everett framing rather than a rejection of physics altogether. In Many‑Worlds, you get a vast ontology of non‑communicating branches; in Orch‑OR you get something more like an epistemology of selection: one classical world per conscious moment, chosen via quantum‑gravitational collapse in the brain’s microtubules, with non‑computable input from the structure of spacetime itself. On that view, Dick isn’t literally hopping between Everett branches; his consciousness is the site where different possible world‑models are explored in quantum superposition and then reduced. “Orthogonal time” becomes the occasional selection of unusually radical alternatives - world‑models in which Nixon doesn’t fall, Rome never ends, or the prison track never got corrected - which then register phenomenologically as visits to parallel presents, déjà vu, and “wrong” memories.
The programmer–reprogrammer and VALIS then map quite naturally onto Penrose’s idea of non‑algorithmic guidance from the fabric of reality. If spacetime’s quantum geometry biases which outcomes are favored at each objective reduction, you effectively have a built‑in steering mechanism nudging histories toward higher complexity or an Omega‑like endpoint. A destabilised temporal lobe plus drugs and anesthesia could easily be recast as a brain with altered Orch‑OR dynamics - overexposed, for a time, to that deeper biasing structure. Dick’s pink beam and sense of an external, information‑rich mind would simply be what it feels like, from the inside, when a human nervous system temporarily gains unusually vivid access to the process by which one history is selected from many. In that Penrosean reading, PKD isn’t a tourist in the multiverse so much as a rare witness to the selection rule underneath it.
Great piece, elements of Reality Transurfing
Interesting
Perhaps Philip K. Dick lived within Aion; sacred and eternal, which is not an extension of time but an absence of time.