Thanks- I tend to think that temperature it mainly regulated by the amount of hydrogen / water vapour- and volcanic underwater eruptions trigger temperature changes. I also tend to think we are told to worry too much about our influence on Gaia. I am not worrying- and keep exhaling - specifically when reading the fear mongering by the usual suspects in the usual media.
Effectively provocative piece. May I add that two vitally important scientific discoveries are consistently excluded from discussion. One is the Schwarzchild equation, which proves that the carbon dioxide panic is mere hyperventilation. "CO2’s thermal contribution to the climate is vital at lower levels, but vanishingly small above 400ppm. By far the most important ‘greenhouse gas’ is water vapour. Water in the atmospheric phase of its cycle composes around 70% of all greenhouse gases and creates about 90% of the greenhouse effect.4 CO2 plays a much smaller role, and its warming effect diminishes as more is added. Atmospheric temperature exhibits a logarithmic — not arithmetic! – dependence on carbon dioxide levels, as described by the Schwarzschild equation for radiative transfer — that is, the warming effect declines rapidly with increased concentration.5 This means that there can be no ‘tipping point’ in terms of atmospheric carbon; that’s why no ‘runaway warming’ is observed in the history of the earth, despite enormously higher levels of CO2 in the past. Dr William Happer recently used the Schwarzschild equation — which is not scientifically disputed, even by the IPCC, merely politically ignored — to confirm that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to a reduction of only 1% in radiative transfer to outer space, and a warming of only 0.71 degrees." https://thelethaltext.substack.com/p/the-carbon-epiphany
The second, actually an extensive group of discoveries, is the Milankovitch, Bray and Eddy cycles which actually govern climate. If you want to prevent climate change, I'm afraid you're going to have to remodel the planet's eccentric orbit, tilt and spin. You're also going to have to replace the sun with something that does not fluctuate in output and has no life of its own. "The Bray and Eddy solar cycles map the fluctuating intensity of the sun’s radiative output, and the Milankovitch cycles determine how much of that energy reaches the top of the atmosphere (TOA) at any one time.7 Then there are the Feynman and Schwaab sunspot cycles. We know that a more or less active sun corresponds with fluctuations in the solar magnetic field and the Earth’s magnetic shield, prohibiting or permitting greater or lesser penetration by the cosmic particles which nucleate cloud (Friis-Christensen and Lassen 1991, Svensmark 2007), and thus govern cloud variation and the albedo effect, one of the Earth’s most fundamental homeostatic mechanisms." https://thelethaltext.substack.com/p/the-carbon-epiphany.
I particularly recommend the brilliant research of Gregory Wrightstone in his latest book “A Very Convenient Warming.” He gives an overview in this presentation:
This is either the darkest joke written this year or the most dangerous piece of denial I’ve read this month. I genuinely can’t tell which.
The studies are real. All four of them. You cited three. The fourth — Winkler et al. 2021, the most recent in your own list — shows the greening trend decelerating, browning intensifying, tropical rainforests under stress. Climate strain, not CO2 fertilization, now dominates most biomes. The fertilization effect is weakening as plants acclimate.
The NASA headline you reference reads: “CO2 is making Earth greener — for now.” You deleted “for now.”
The Devonian at 4,000 ppm is the tell. Life was abundant — over millions of years of gradual change, with no human agriculture, no coastal cities, ecosystems with geological time to adapt. The rate of change is the crisis. A man falling from a fifty-story building passes some very scenic views on the way down.
One real effect does not cancel ocean acidification, aquifer depletion, topsoil loss, species extinction, and temperature instability happening simultaneously. Selecting the one indicator that looks good while the system destabilizes around it is not science communication. It is a magic trick.
The writing is beautiful. That’s what makes it dangerous. Liberation from fear is being sold here, not truth. And people are buying it because they desperately want to.
That’s not a gift. That’s a disservice to every person who reads it.
Yup. Probably „99% of scientists agree“ just like in covid, mrna vaccines, saturated fat, statins etc etc. Same playbook. Be careful of the expert majority in today‘s world. That should be clear by now.
Thanks for the feedback Gabriel. The Devonian period is 400 million years ago. Early modern humans appeared 300.000 years ago give or take. Ergo no agriculture (which began roughly 20K years ago) or coastal cities. What's dangerous is the CO2 hoax and how it's being leveraged against human populations in a coordinated attempt to take control of humanity. Far more dangerous than CO2.
You just confirmed my point about the Devonian. We agree on the science. Where we part ways is the conclusion.
The coordinated control narrative requires believing that thousands of independent scientists across dozens of countries and competing institutions have maintained a unified deception for fifty years. Exxon’s own researchers — whose findings were buried by Exxon — were apparently also in on it.
The CO2 data isn’t a hoax. It’s measurements. Satellites don’t lie, as you said yourself.
And your piece is not dark humor but profound denial.
I'm glad you appreciate my genuine good humor. BTW, remember, CO2 has risen from ~375, to ~425 PARTS PER MILLION....that's like a .000001% increase.... Given the BILLIONS of TONS of herbicide, insecticide, etc., the biosphere is the battlespace for the depopulation wars raging currently. THAT is the MORE DIRE crisis....
I was just replying to the post above that was a clear denial of climate change and I have different opinions while being in a good place to get first hand information, not just watching Fox news...
Read my posts if you want to understand my position better, but being 8 billions human is indeed a big part of the problem. We don't need to seek malicious intent when stupidity alone explains it.
Thank you. What a revolutionary concept ... you are not the disease.
Thanks- I tend to think that temperature it mainly regulated by the amount of hydrogen / water vapour- and volcanic underwater eruptions trigger temperature changes. I also tend to think we are told to worry too much about our influence on Gaia. I am not worrying- and keep exhaling - specifically when reading the fear mongering by the usual suspects in the usual media.
Effectively provocative piece. May I add that two vitally important scientific discoveries are consistently excluded from discussion. One is the Schwarzchild equation, which proves that the carbon dioxide panic is mere hyperventilation. "CO2’s thermal contribution to the climate is vital at lower levels, but vanishingly small above 400ppm. By far the most important ‘greenhouse gas’ is water vapour. Water in the atmospheric phase of its cycle composes around 70% of all greenhouse gases and creates about 90% of the greenhouse effect.4 CO2 plays a much smaller role, and its warming effect diminishes as more is added. Atmospheric temperature exhibits a logarithmic — not arithmetic! – dependence on carbon dioxide levels, as described by the Schwarzschild equation for radiative transfer — that is, the warming effect declines rapidly with increased concentration.5 This means that there can be no ‘tipping point’ in terms of atmospheric carbon; that’s why no ‘runaway warming’ is observed in the history of the earth, despite enormously higher levels of CO2 in the past. Dr William Happer recently used the Schwarzschild equation — which is not scientifically disputed, even by the IPCC, merely politically ignored — to confirm that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to a reduction of only 1% in radiative transfer to outer space, and a warming of only 0.71 degrees." https://thelethaltext.substack.com/p/the-carbon-epiphany
The second, actually an extensive group of discoveries, is the Milankovitch, Bray and Eddy cycles which actually govern climate. If you want to prevent climate change, I'm afraid you're going to have to remodel the planet's eccentric orbit, tilt and spin. You're also going to have to replace the sun with something that does not fluctuate in output and has no life of its own. "The Bray and Eddy solar cycles map the fluctuating intensity of the sun’s radiative output, and the Milankovitch cycles determine how much of that energy reaches the top of the atmosphere (TOA) at any one time.7 Then there are the Feynman and Schwaab sunspot cycles. We know that a more or less active sun corresponds with fluctuations in the solar magnetic field and the Earth’s magnetic shield, prohibiting or permitting greater or lesser penetration by the cosmic particles which nucleate cloud (Friis-Christensen and Lassen 1991, Svensmark 2007), and thus govern cloud variation and the albedo effect, one of the Earth’s most fundamental homeostatic mechanisms." https://thelethaltext.substack.com/p/the-carbon-epiphany.
Better get cracking!
All of the above was confirmed in Lindzen & Happer's 2025 paper, a comprehensive review of the science on climate change. https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lindzen-Happer-GHGs-and-Fossil-Fuels-Climate-Physics-2025-06-07.pdf
Right on. Nice addition to the piece. Thank you.
Welcome. I'm quite impressed by the civility of the discussion here btw, even your critics. Nice to see.
Everyone loves each other here :)
Well, thank you again CR. Although I was already aware of the greening it was pure pleasure reading your post.
Thank you for spreading the Good News, Jan! I just covered this and many other aspects of the climate con in the article I published last week:
• “Losing My Religion”: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/losing-my-religion
I particularly recommend the brilliant research of Gregory Wrightstone in his latest book “A Very Convenient Warming.” He gives an overview in this presentation:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT2SvlAkE5s
I had the pleasure of attending a presentation by Gregory last week and look forward to sharing more of his revelatory findings.
Great to hear some positive news but I’d never listen to the likes of NASA 😀
This is either the darkest joke written this year or the most dangerous piece of denial I’ve read this month. I genuinely can’t tell which.
The studies are real. All four of them. You cited three. The fourth — Winkler et al. 2021, the most recent in your own list — shows the greening trend decelerating, browning intensifying, tropical rainforests under stress. Climate strain, not CO2 fertilization, now dominates most biomes. The fertilization effect is weakening as plants acclimate.
The NASA headline you reference reads: “CO2 is making Earth greener — for now.” You deleted “for now.”
The Devonian at 4,000 ppm is the tell. Life was abundant — over millions of years of gradual change, with no human agriculture, no coastal cities, ecosystems with geological time to adapt. The rate of change is the crisis. A man falling from a fifty-story building passes some very scenic views on the way down.
One real effect does not cancel ocean acidification, aquifer depletion, topsoil loss, species extinction, and temperature instability happening simultaneously. Selecting the one indicator that looks good while the system destabilizes around it is not science communication. It is a magic trick.
The writing is beautiful. That’s what makes it dangerous. Liberation from fear is being sold here, not truth. And people are buying it because they desperately want to.
That’s not a gift. That’s a disservice to every person who reads it.
Yup. Probably „99% of scientists agree“ just like in covid, mrna vaccines, saturated fat, statins etc etc. Same playbook. Be careful of the expert majority in today‘s world. That should be clear by now.
Thanks for the feedback Gabriel. The Devonian period is 400 million years ago. Early modern humans appeared 300.000 years ago give or take. Ergo no agriculture (which began roughly 20K years ago) or coastal cities. What's dangerous is the CO2 hoax and how it's being leveraged against human populations in a coordinated attempt to take control of humanity. Far more dangerous than CO2.
You just confirmed my point about the Devonian. We agree on the science. Where we part ways is the conclusion.
The coordinated control narrative requires believing that thousands of independent scientists across dozens of countries and competing institutions have maintained a unified deception for fifty years. Exxon’s own researchers — whose findings were buried by Exxon — were apparently also in on it.
The CO2 data isn’t a hoax. It’s measurements. Satellites don’t lie, as you said yourself.
And your piece is not dark humor but profound denial.
Thanks for the clarification.
They would LOVE YOU over at the Flat Earth websites....you'd fit right in. You could be the resident Devil's Advocate....
Resident Devil's Advocate, that was the funniest minute of my day...
😂 🤣 😅
I'm glad you appreciate my genuine good humor. BTW, remember, CO2 has risen from ~375, to ~425 PARTS PER MILLION....that's like a .000001% increase.... Given the BILLIONS of TONS of herbicide, insecticide, etc., the biosphere is the battlespace for the depopulation wars raging currently. THAT is the MORE DIRE crisis....
I appreciate.
I was just replying to the post above that was a clear denial of climate change and I have different opinions while being in a good place to get first hand information, not just watching Fox news...
Read my posts if you want to understand my position better, but being 8 billions human is indeed a big part of the problem. We don't need to seek malicious intent when stupidity alone explains it.
Negative energy 👺
🤣🤣🤣
Your mind will find whatever it needs to confirm your beliefs.
Love
Was that your exhale? I knew I smelled garlic. Aaahhh
And to those prone to panic attacks.... just breeeeathe....