Obliterate Conformity
obstacle

A mind trip to peace in the midst of snafu.

I’m on my way to the airport at sunrise. A taxi comes to pick me up at the corner of a cobbled street, swerves abruptly sideways, then parks. Despite the morning blur, I notice a conspicuous absence of any type of obstacle. No stray cat, pidgeon, rock, asphalt bump or other geometric or organic protuberance that would force a car to adopt a hard evasive tactic. I jump in the cab and forget about it.

The driver is a veteran of the wheel. His face is made of leather, delineated by asphalt and nicotine. He asks me to sit in the front due to “spilled water” in the back. We set off and within minutes I’m reintroduced to the mystery of the absent obstacle. He yanks the wheel counterclockwise and back on a straight road, calmly, as if we’re inside an imaginary asteroid belt and dodging invisible rocks is part of the flight routine.

They say taxi drivers have especially well developed frontal cortices, but this man may be tuned into a parallel world. I scan the road ahead to see if I can learn to see what he sees. Ten seconds later, I spot the first clue. A dark patch on the road. But it’s not an obstacle. It’s an old pothole that has been fixed with asphalt-emulsion crack filler. It’s got a completely smooth surface. Like driving over dried paint.

Swoosh! He decides to avoid the patch anyway. I’m thrown sideways for the umpth time. At least I understand his rationale now.

A minute later, he swerves again. But this time it’s not even the remainder of a former pothole, but a perfectly fixed crack, maybe no more than a few inches long, barely recognizable. It’s just shaded. Does he dodge shadows, too? Imagine mines under the shades? See holes that lead to China? What exactly does he see?

Like an alarmed goose that keeps a sideways glance at the prowling fox, I follow him on the edge of my peripheral vision to make sure he doesn’t shake like the asylum patients in Jacob’s Ladder or manifest any other behavioral ticks or obsessive-compulsive patterns that could prevent me from reaching the airport in time. He seems fine and stable in every other respect, except for his relationship with the wheel. He even looks smart, at least in a specific subject area, such as the comparative attrition factor of rubber tires.

I decide to broach the topic of his driving style discreetly.

“It’s a beautiful morning, jaa? Did your car recently hit a bump and explode, or why are we zigzagging the asphalt?”

Except I only say the first sentence.

The conversation takes off cordially about the intricacies of traffic in the early hours of the morning and then lands on the topic of the dark patches.

“Bumpy problem,” the Latvian man tells me out of his own initiative and points the index finger in several directions. The “bumpy problems” are everywhere. I nod, gently aghast, feigning understanding. After a long strategic pause, I decide to lance the abscess.

“But, err, avoiding all the bumpy problems also causes a bit of bumpiness, no?”

I use my hands to signal the difference between vertical and lateral motion. There is a g-force that’s related to jerky sideways motion, too. And in the present system, the lateral g-force is certainly higher than the vertical force that’s involved in crossing a shaded patch on asphalt, which even in the worst-case scenario is no more than a millimeter or two above the asphalt lining.

But my dialectic strategy implodes.

The man falls silent. A reddish glow develops on his cheeks. His right foot tenses up on the gas pedal. The car begins to accelerate, and I realize I may have hit an emotional trigger point, something that could date back to an event involving potholes in his early childhood, or maybe an improvised explosive device (IED) during Operation Desert Storm. The trip to the airport has become a lot more precarious than I bargained for, as he may be identifying me as the perpetrator of his trauma, without even realizing it.

By the time we sverwe into the airport at formula speeds, I just want to get out of the car in one piece.

We come to a screeching halt. I pay the driver, thank him and get out. He is still steaming as he steps out of the car and hands me the luggage without eye contact. Relieved that I’m standing on firm ground, I walk into the terminal with a cartoon smile on my face, happy I’m not in a metallic inferno on the side of the road being roasted into a kebab.

Later, as I sit in the plane, I wonder about the power of the mind and feel a bit of empathy for the driver. For him, the obstacles were as real as stone statues, probably. I wonder how prevalent this knack is in our lives in general, when it hits me.

All obstacles are imaginary. They’re mind initiated and controlled. Imaginary obstacles define behavior in all modern people, who are routinely traumatized, simply because our bodies are still not — after 20,000 years of agriculture — used to living within four walls and fences in asphalt and concrete jungles. We just pretend we’re cool about it because everyone else does too.

I think of my own obstacles, past and present. I can’t come up with a single example that’s somehow real, that doesn’t originate from my emotional cortex.

I fall into a hypnotic slumber during the flight, my head nodding like a small Elvis statue on a car dashboard, and briefly enter a mental state that represents an absolute absence of obstacles.

The peace and perfection are like cold vanilla fudge ice cream with hot raspberries.

When the plane lands, I instantly melt back into the asteroid belt. But this time I remember it really is just an asteroid belt in my mind. A sense of peace accompanies me even when I need to dodge stuff.

I decide to thank the driver with a bottle of Lagavulin if I see him next time.

 

Published in NationOfChange

The psychological and neurological foundation of why mostly “normal” people go postal.

We will murder 38 people today in America. Over half of them will be family, friends, lovers, or acquaintances. Wives will shoot husbands. Boyfriends will strangle girlfriends. Parents will snuff out their kids. Teenage sons will stab their fathers.

Only 15 percent of the murders will involve a felony. More than a quarter will go down during an argument or a brawl.

At least one police officer will shoot to death an unarmed black man. Overall, blacks will mostly kill blacks and whites will mostly kill whites.

Two thirds of the time, we will use a firearm. If we don’t have access to firepower, we will use our fists, knife, feet or a blunt instrument. Should those fail, we will strangle, asphyxiate, or drug.

Tomorrow the numbers will be the same. The tally for 2015 will be 14,000 slayings with a two percent variance. Year in and year out the homicide statistics by the Department of Justice and the FBI predict a stable future of mass slaughter.

Not a slaughter by psychos, professional killers, or whackos, but by “normal” folks like you, me and…

Meet The Lizard

In the 1970s, psychologist Seymour Epstein formulated the so-called Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) in which the human brain uses two systems to process cognitive input: the analytical-rational, which is conscious, slow and logical (a.k.a. “Shakespeare”); and the intuitive-experiential, which is unconscious, fast, and emotionally-driven (a.k.a. “Lizard”).

The Lizard resides in the oldest part of our brain (the “reptile brain” evolved over 600 million years ago) called the basal ganglia. This area controls our motor movements, routine behaviors, and emotions.

Shakespeare lives in the more evolved (up to 10 million years old) outer region of the brain (the prefrontal cortex, located at the tip of the frontal lobe) where he handles analytical-rational functions, recognizes future consequences from current actions, and distinguishes between “good” and “bad” actions.

When we are convinced about our righteousness, moral decency and ability to control our future, it’s Shakespeare talking. Rest of the time, we’re on reptilian autopilot.

Author Malcolm Gladwell weighed the pros and cons of this duality in his 2005 book Blink. He uses the case of Amadou Diallo, a 22-year old Guinean American from lower Manhattan, to demonstrate one of the cons.

Diallo was unarmed and hanging out on his porch when four cops shot him 41 times. Prognosis: the relatively inexperienced officers’ were influenced by a racial bias, which activated their reptilian response. When Diallo pulled his wallet to show his ID, the cops “actually saw a gun” and responded in kind. Gladwell calls this phenomenon “thin-slicing.”

After millions of years of evolution, the Lizard continues to co-exist with us for a reason. Survival requires fast decisions in a jungle of threats. Although thin-slicing can result in mayhem, it also allows us to form instant expert opinions, hunches, and insights without using the slower Shakespeare… otherwise we’d be lost in a flood of cognitive input.

The flipside is that the Lizard also constructs instant stereotypes and thin-slices situations as dangerous when we’re not experienced enough and suffer an emotional bias, like racism, or passionate love.

The Killer Inside

I almost killed a man in my mid-twenties. It was a classic bar setup. He was a tall, Caucasian male, trying to get a drink on a Friday night, shoving his way through the crowd. He dropped my date to the ground as he made his way to the bar. I picked her up and made sure she was all right, before heading over with the idea of “peaceful disarmament.”

By the time I got to him, my Lizard had taken over. 600 million year old synapses switched to DEFCON-1 mode and convinced me that I was staring at an existential threat: a hooligan.

While my Shakespeare experienced a whiteout, my Lizard took care of business. Moments later I regained consciousness and noticed a crowd staring at me. There was a lifeless body crumpled in front of me.

My first rational thought was about jail. My second thought was about who “I” really was. The real Shakespeare captured it in Hamlet.

“We know what we are, but know not what we may be.”

The real Shakespeare seemed to be well aware of the reptile in him.

“A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.”

We don’t want to admit that we are never truly in control. We are masters at projecting ourselves as sane and complete individuals – especially to ourselves.

Moments before my whiteout, I thought I was acting “honorably.” I was Cool Hand Luke, taking care of the “bad guy.” But this was the Lizard talking. The Lizard is a master at patching up the black holes with details that “make sense.” And after the deed is committed, Shakespeare has to either follow the Lizard’s lead or admit that he is not in control (hard work).

Modern neurologists agree. The human brain mixes reality and fairytales in the same part of the brain. Our reality is like Vodka Martini.

Listen to two sides involved in a violent altercation, and you will hear two separate realities about “what happened.” Which one is actually real? An outside spectator might chip in with “what actually happened,” but coming from a human observer, it too would be emotionally thin-sliced.

Bring in a group of people and you still don’t necessarily validate objective phenomena. Often the opposite is true. Groups of people have the ability to compound observations even further via emotional contagion and cognitive dissonance. Take Fox News.

Bottom line. There is no single reality.

Yet someone still needs to take the rap for murder – and all other violent nonsense we commit on a daily basis. Fracking. War. Genocide. Child abuse. Trickle-down economics. Modern art.

Taking Control Of The Lizard

Most of the witnesses agreed. I was a slam-dunk maniac. I attacked a gentleman who was simply anxious to buy a beer.

Had the gentleman not finally stood up, I might have been disillusioned by how “unfair” society is for locking up a poet for something he didn’t do. I may have joined a particularly violent group of skinheads and empowered my Lizard even further.

Punishing the Lizard doesn’t work, as demonstrated by the 2.4 million Americans inside the Prison Industrial Complex. Two out of three released prisoners are rearrested within three years.

But another approach might help to tackle the Lizard.

According to new experiments in dual-process theory (latest evolution of CEST), it is possible to train Shakespeare to be conscious of the Lizard. Implicit Association Tests, for example, measure our biases, such as racial bias, of which we are almost never aware. By repeated exposure to our unconscious biases, we can learn to understand our subconscious triggers.

Dual perception is becoming one of the “most significant theoretical developments in the history of social psychology,” according to more than 100 prominent PhD’s in the latest book on the subject, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. But they also acknowledge that we are barely scratching the surface of the Pandora’s Box – our true psychological drivers.

The PhD’s know this much though. The poet has the backseat up to 95 percent of the time. Rest of the time it’s the Lizard at the wheel. Let’s assume this is really the case. That leaves “you” 3 minutes per hour to make conscious decisions…

(If you doubt this, try a simple self-awareness test: count to 10 without forgetting yourself.)

Despite the recent progress, it’s clear that we won’t be using dual perception theory to pacify a police state or wake up the warmongers for some time to come. But we can use it to identify our own telltale signs before our primitive selves take over. The singing in the eardrums, the quickening heartbeat, the pressure in the solar plexus… what ever pops our individual soda.

Modern psychiatry and neurochemistry tells us this much. In order to gain control, we first have to give up our illusion of control.

Coincidentally it’s what the Buddhists have been trying to tell us for millennia.